|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Nov 13, 2012 14:17:13 GMT -5
And that's what keeps me going
|
|
|
|
Post by Bot on Nov 13, 2012 21:12:56 GMT -5
Skyfall: boring as hell. Don't understand why snobby critics liked it. There's a whole host of problems with it, like their inability to have any suspense whatsoever and awkward dialogue to force a story no one gave a damn about. Not the best Bond ever. Not even Craig's best. Meh - I thought it was OK. Of course the best part was the end where it all sort of comes full circle. Although I'm not sure why everyone is going orgasmic over it. It's pretty plain as far as movies go. |
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 5, 2012 12:33:36 GMT -5
Lincoln: a movie made by baby boomers for baby boomers.
Day-Lewis was as expected.
Same with Fields...if you were expecting annoying as hell...which I guess Mrs. Abe Lincoln was...sooo..., good casting?
Tommy Lee Jones borrowed his drag clothes from JFK
Half the movie had nothing to do with the story...it was just Lincoln being Lincoln.
Meh -
|
|
|
|
Post by Bot on Dec 5, 2012 22:15:28 GMT -5
Lincoln: a movie made by baby boomers for baby boomers. Day-Lewis was as expected. Same with Fields...if you were expecting annoying as hell...which I guess Mrs. Abe Lincoln was...sooo..., good casting? Tommy Lee Jones borrowed his drag clothes from JFK Half the movie had nothing to do with the story...it was just Lincoln being Lincoln. Meh - Was it as good as Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter? I thoroughly enjoyed that movie. Didn't have any Academy Award winning performances in it, but it was a fun 2 hours. |
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 12, 2012 20:53:47 GMT -5
So DDL's Lincoln sounds like Mr Burns, and the movie in general looks like more typically hokey Spielberg schlock.
The Hobbit looks & sounds like rubbish.
QT better come through.
|
|
|
|
Post by JayAre on Dec 12, 2012 21:29:25 GMT -5
GET RID OF HOLMGREN YOU HACK
|
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 12, 2012 23:09:48 GMT -5
It does need Jimmy Hapslams III on it
|
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 13, 2012 0:14:53 GMT -5
If you need to watch a movie with a female, Silver Linings Playbook is really good until the end falls into cliche hell.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 13, 2012 0:47:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 13, 2012 0:48:06 GMT -5
If you need to watch a movie with a female, Anne Hathaway's vagina. Indeed. |
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 18, 2012 15:59:38 GMT -5
Prometheus: HOLY FUCKING BAG OF MEH!
|
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 19, 2012 18:21:38 GMT -5
FB Posts from white people on Dec 26:
"Les Miserables was AMAZING!!! Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway deserve Oscars. Going to see it again!!! Who's coming with me???!?!" (Liked by 42 other white people)
Tweets from black people on Dec 26:
"Bootleg Jango. Jayme Fox killin. #KillWhitey"
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 19, 2012 20:06:01 GMT -5
[Cameron Meier, Allison Willmore, and Rodrigo Perez sit down to dinner together with plates full of fresh steaming piles of poo.]
CM: Mmmmm!
AW: Mmm, mmm, mmmm!
RP: These poos are delectable, I say!
CM: Exquisitely so, yes! Mmm! Mmm!
RP: Mmmm hmmm, mmm, mmm.
AW: Do I have poo in my teeth?
CM/AW/RP: Teeheeheehee!
[omnomnomnomnom...]
|
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 19, 2012 20:51:19 GMT -5
<-- spending his Christmas with Tarantino instead of family
<-- smart
|
|
koesters
Full Member
Non-Member
might be lost.
Posts: 170
|
Post by koesters on Dec 26, 2012 10:36:58 GMT -5
^ Saw LesMis last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 27, 2012 10:59:47 GMT -5
^Yep.
"Lee says he's boycotting Tarantino's 'Django'" = EVERYWHERE
|
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 27, 2012 21:58:39 GMT -5
Django Unchained: Meh
The Good:
Christopher Waltz and Leonardo DiCaprio. Also Don Johnson's small role was right, as was Samuel L. Jackson but not as perfect as Waltz and DiCaprio. Leonardo's "Calvin Candie" is like Tom Cruise's role in Tropic Thunder...so outside the normal schtick that it's fantastic. Given the second half of the movie (see The Bad), DiCaprio was the only thing keeping my attention. ALL Waltz and DiCaprio scenes are worth the price of a ticket. Best parts, by far.
The overall direction was standard Tarantino...with extra splattery violence. Tarantino cast himself...which was stupid...but then awesome. Don't want to say anymore on that.
In the Tarantino movie tree...this was under Inglorious and Pulp...by a good long margin.
The Bad:
It was two movies. The first half, with heavy amounts of Waltz driving it, was way better than the second half...even though DiCaprio was perfect. After the obligatory invasive giant font scrolling across the screen telling us that Tarantino's second movie was now starting, it all sort of lost its charm. And that's a shame. There was a great movie in there but it got lost in the 'just good movie' shenanigans.
The ending was disappointing. Fumbled into laziness.
Overall:
Even with DiCaprio's awesomeness, the second half disappointment clouds the first half brilliance. So...meh.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 28, 2012 12:37:12 GMT -5
I choose to believe that's a horrible review.
And I will now seek out some more "woo-hoo-soooopertimez!" reviews to feed my confirmation bias.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 28, 2012 12:44:03 GMT -5
And just like that, Ann Hornaday is pleased to oblige me.
"Django Unchained" possesses an unmistakable subversive power, its playfully insurrectionist spirit perhaps the modern-day pop-culture equivalent of far more high stakes rebellions of yore.
1) Horn
2) a
3) day
4) She's a Top Critic, George. Are you a Top Critic? I suspect you are not!
5) For the Washington Post, even. That's a VERY major newspaper, you know. Very.
6) Subversive!
7) Insurrectionist!!
8) High Stakes Rebellions!!!
9) Of yore!
10) Hornaday
Enthusiasm restored.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 28, 2012 12:55:39 GMT -5
 (^Hornaday) |
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 28, 2012 13:00:11 GMT -5
I forgot to mention the big black hairy balls.
There are too many in this movie.
Hornaday likes em big and black.
Suck that.
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 28, 2012 13:12:41 GMT -5
The Bad:
Two big black hairy balls. The first, with heavy amounts of Waltz ****ing it, was way better than the second...even though DiCaprio was perfect. After the obligatory invasive giant **nt scrolling across the screen telling us that Tarantino's second big black hairy ball was now *****ing, it all sort of lost its charm. And that's a shame. There was a great ***** in there but it got lost in the 'just good *****' shenanigans.
^Subtext
|
|
|
|
Post by vecseysbeard on Dec 28, 2012 13:51:04 GMT -5
You know...it just wasn't as good as I had hoped/thought it would be.
Not one scene holds up to the opening scene or the basement bar scene in Inglorious.
So there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bot on Dec 28, 2012 20:53:58 GMT -5
... 4) She's a Top Critic, George. Are you a Top Critic? ... "And it will be. I assure you Dr. Brody, Dr. Jones. We have top men working on it right now." "Who?" "Top... Men..." |
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 28, 2012 20:57:10 GMT -5
This is the best exchange in here in months and Cuntsters is around. I shall remain silent hoping this continues.
|
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 30, 2012 21:42:49 GMT -5
<-- just accidentally saw Les Mis (I swear it was forced on me by gawd to punish me).
<-- will explain and explain that shitpile when <-- is no longer shaking from the horror of that movie
|
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 31, 2012 9:31:07 GMT -5
<-- still too traumatized to write of the experience
|
|
koesters
Full Member
Non-Member
might be lost.
Posts: 170
|
Post by koesters on Dec 31, 2012 9:51:58 GMT -5
<-- just "accidentally" saw Les Mis Other things that surprised no one- Shurmur fired. Mayans were wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by e0 on Dec 31, 2012 10:22:04 GMT -5
Runtime: 2 Hours and 37 Minutes
Intermissions: 0
|
|
|
|
Post by bwwyyyy on Dec 31, 2012 10:29:02 GMT -5
^Fell for the oldest trick in the advertising book.
Ann Hathaway's vagina.
|
|
